Mar
18
2009
18
2009
My perspective on SUN and IBM merger
An article by 
From an investor point of view merger are always bad. The reason being that instead of the investor controlling the type of stock he wants to buy, the merging parties start controlling it.
However in this case. Both companies have solid balance sheets excellent products and services and were in my top stock list always. Therefore the merging company is also a strong buy
Did you enjoy this article? Share it!
About the Author: Compare Brokers
CompareBroker an affiliate of best online brokerage firms helps consumers compare and search various online brokerage firms, futures trading brokers, low cost discount brokers, top mutual fund companies, investing stocks and bonds in terms of maintenance fees, stocks purchase fees, minimum deposits required etc
1 Comment + Add Comment
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- Taming the Critics of Globalization
- Professional Strategies for Disciplined Investors
- G-20 Countries Debt Fears Resurface: Should Investors Worry about another US Downgrade?
- Good Time to Invest in 2012? Get greedy while most investors are fearful
- Understanding Investment Risks and Effective Diversification
Recent Comments
- francisco on Ever tried hands with Binary Options Trading?
- Vickie on Is EZTrader – Online Binary Options Trading Brokerage – a Scam
- Fraud Protection Agency on Why Invest in Visa Inc (V)? 2012 Stock Price Outlook and Peer Comparison
- Rial on High Dividend Yielding Energy Sector Stocks for 2012: Top Picks with Price Targets
- Varun Walia on Few more Energy Stocks for Long Term Investors
That’s fair enough.. my apologies for being so dismissive.
It is an opinion forum so I’m at fault.
I nevertheless feel that there are more complex aspects to this merger
than just balance sheets, good products/services.
Management is a huge aspect that needs to be carefully looked at if
this merger is to succeed [ATI/AMD didn't merge together too well, for
example, albeit on a vastly smaller scale].
Excellent products and services didn’t do any good to Sun’s share
price over the last year so what’s to say Sun will be any good for
IBM’s already strong position.
Maybe IBM sees value in Sun’s hardware technologies and intends to use
this asset to reposition itself as a predominantly hardware company
again. I bet IBM feels that, if Sun’s product lines were better
marketed and managed from a Sales and CEO point of view in the last
12/24 months, Sun wouldn’t be in this currently weak position.
IBM probably sees that the responsibility for Sun’s currently weak
position lies squarely with Schwartz and that if he got ‘bumped’ in
the merger/takeover, the new Sun arm of IBM would gain in strength
immediately by this alone [and that's not even noting Schwartz's huge
salary that wouldn't have to be paid!]. An IBM guy would competently
take over his job.
I do hope the merger works out well for the share price as I have 400
shares@$8.97.